The Effectiveness of Service Delivery for Issuing Relocation Voting Certificates at the Palangka Raya City Election Commission for Migrant Students

Irpan Jurayz; Nurhasanah Nurhasanah; Saipul Saipul; Ramza Fatria

doi:10.70074/jaspdt.v2i1.68

Authors

Irpan Jurayz Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
Nurhasanah Nurhasanah Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
Saipul Saipul Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
Ramza Fatria Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70074/jaspdt.v2i1.68

Keywords:

Students, Voter Transfer, Political Participation

Abstract

The political participation of migrant students is a crucial issue in the context of Indonesia's 2024 general elections, particularly in Palangka Raya City, reflecting structural and cultural challenges within the country's democratic framework. This study aims to explore the barriers faced by migrant students in the voter transfer process, focusing on the complexity of administrative procedures, informational gaps, and inadequate infrastructure support. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed to examine the experiences and perceptions of migrant students regarding the effectiveness of electoral services provided by the local election commission (KPU). Data were collected through in-depth interviews with migrant students, KPU staff, and the Head of the KPU in Palangka Raya City. Purposive sampling was utilized to ensure the selection of informants relevant to the research objectives, capable of offering detailed insights. The findings reveal that the participation of migrant students in democratic processes is influenced by the interplay between structural barriers and individual motivation. The study applies the theories of political mobilization and structuration to analyze the dynamics of migrant students' political participation, highlighting the interaction between individual agency and social structures in a democratic context. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the factors affecting youth voter participation and serves as a foundation for further studies on participatory democracy in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amelia, R. R., & Yuwono, D. T. (2024). Supporting learning information system through knowledge management optimization using long short-term memory method. KnE Social Sciences, 361–371.

Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge :Cambridge University Press.

Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press

Chomsky, N. (2003). Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance. New York:Henry Holt and Company.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). "Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension." Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68

Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing

Firmansyah, A. (2021). "Partisipasi Politik Pemilih Muda di Era Digital." Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Pemerintahan, 12(3)

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Gaffar, Afan.(1999).Politik Indonesia: Transisi Menuju Demokrasi. Jogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press

Klandermans, B. (1997). The Social Psychology of Protest. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishers.

Levitt, P., & Schiller, N. G. (2004). Conceptualizing Simultaneity: A Transnational Social Field Perspective on Society. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002–1039.

Marcus Mietzner. (2019). “Authoritarian Innovations in Indonesia: Electoral Narrowing, Identity Politics and Executive Illiberalism”. Journal of Democracy, 30(4)

Norris, P. (2002). Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge University Press.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Pratama, R., & Setiawan, A. (2022). "Dinamika Partisipasi Pemilih Muda dalam Pemilu Indonesia." Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 13(1)

Pratama, R., & Setiawan, A. (2022). "Dinamika Partisipasi Pemilih Muda dalam Pemilu Indonesia." Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 13(1), hal. 20-35.

Rizkiana, H. (2023). "Partisipasi Politik Generasi Muda: Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Perantau." Jurnal Studi Pemilu, 4(2), hal. 167-189.

Steers, R. M. (1977). Organizational Effectiveness: A Behavioral View. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing Company.

Surbakti, Ramlan. (2010).Memahami Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia

Tilly, Charles. (2017). From Mobilization to Revolution. Addison-Wesley. Routledge

Teorell, J., Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2007). Political Participation: Mapping the Terrain. Routledge

Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Yuwono, D. T., Hariyanti, A., & Yunanri, W. (2024). Applying clustering and recommendation system for effective supervision in Central Kalimantan Inspectorate. Jurnal Informatika Teknologi dan Sains (JINTEKS), 6(2), 367–374.

Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations. New York: Free Press

Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). "SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality." Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.