Bureaucratic Reform in Improving the Performance Effectiveness of Local Government Apparatus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70074/jaspdt.v2i2.165Keywords:
Bureaucratic Reform, Public Administration, Government Performance, Institutional Governance, Public Sector ManagementAbstract
Bureaucratic reform has become a strategic agenda in strengthening the effectiveness of public administration and improving government performance in delivering public services. The increasing complexity of governance challenges requires government institutions to develop more adaptive administrative systems and improve the professionalism of public officials. Bureaucratic reform is not only related to structural changes within government organizations but also includes the transformation of administrative processes, institutional culture, and performance management systems. This study aims to analyze the role of bureaucratic reform in improving the effectiveness of local government performance and to identify the main factors influencing the success of bureaucratic reform implementation. The research uses a qualitative descriptive approach through literature review and analysis of policy documents related to bureaucratic reform and public sector governance. The results indicate that bureaucratic reform contributes significantly to improving administrative efficiency, strengthening institutional accountability, and enhancing the quality of public services. However, several challenges remain in the implementation of bureaucratic reform, including organizational resistance to change, limited institutional capacity, and inadequate administrative competence among public officials. Strengthening institutional governance, improving professional capacity, and integrating digital governance systems are essential strategies to support sustainable bureaucratic reform in public administration.
Downloads
References
Andrews, R., & Van de Walle, S. (2016). Public management review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1014394
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B., & Bloomberg, L. (2017). Public value governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12745
De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12464
Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2016). Public management reform. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679282.001.0001
Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2018). E-participation and transparency. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12846
Lindgren, I., & Van Veenstra, A. (2018). Digital government transformation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.003
Meijer, A. (2017). Transparency in governance. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315616758
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Digital transformation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Osborne, S. (2018). Public service logic. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1364401
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform.
Torfing, J., Peters, B., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2020). Interactive governance. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199596756.001.0001
Wang, H., & Wan Wart, M. (2021). Public leadership. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13276
Zhang, Y., & Yang, K. (2022). Digital governance and accountability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101640
Purwanto, E. A., & Pramusinto, A. (2018). Reformasi birokrasi di Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.36320
Sari, D., & Nugroho, R. (2021). Transparency in public administration. https://doi.org/10.22146/jap.65432
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dedi Irawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
