Digital-Based Public Service Innovation in Improving the Quality of Government Administration Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70074/jaspdt.v2i2.161Keywords:
Public Service Innovation, Digital Governance, Public Administration, Digital Public Service, Bureaucratic ReformAbstract
Public service innovation has become a critical strategy for improving the quality and efficiency of administrative services in government institutions. The increasing complexity of public needs requires governments to adopt innovative approaches in delivering public services. Digital-based public service innovation is considered an effective solution to enhance service accessibility, transparency, and administrative efficiency. This study aims to analyze the role of digital-based innovation in improving the quality of public administrative services and to examine factors influencing the success of digital public service innovation. The research uses a qualitative descriptive approach with literature review and policy document analysis. Data were obtained from academic journals, government reports, and previous studies discussing public service innovation and digital governance. The findings show that digital innovation significantly contributes to improving service efficiency, reducing bureaucratic complexity, and enhancing citizen satisfaction with public services. However, the implementation of digital public service innovation still faces several challenges such as limited technological infrastructure, inadequate digital competence among public officials, and unequal access to digital services among citizens. Strengthening institutional capacity, improving digital skills among public servants, and expanding digital infrastructure are important strategies to support sustainable public service innovation.
Downloads
References
Andrews, R., & Van de Walle, S. (2016). Public management review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1014394
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B., & Bloomberg, L. (2017). Public value governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12745
De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12464
Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2016). Public management reform. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679282.001.0001
Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2018). E-participation and transparency. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12846
Lindgren, I., & Van Veenstra, A. (2018). Digital government transformation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.003
Meijer, A. (2017). Transparency in governance. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315616758
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Digital transformation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Osborne, S. (2018). Public service logic. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1364401
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform.
Torfing, J., Peters, B., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2020). Interactive governance. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199596756.001.0001
Wang, H., & Wan Wart, M. (2021). Public leadership. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13276
Zhang, Y., & Yang, K. (2022). Digital governance and accountability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101640
Purwanto, E. A., & Pramusinto, A. (2018). Reformasi birokrasi di Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.36320
Sari, D., & Nugroho, R. (2021). Transparency in public administration. https://doi.org/10.22146/jap.65432
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Risdayati Risdayati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







