Government Performance Accountability in Realizing Transparent Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70074/jaspdt.v2i2.158Keywords:
Government Accountability, Public Administration, Governance, Transparency, Public Sector PerformanceAbstract
Government performance accountability is an essential element in strengthening transparent and responsible governance. In modern public administration, accountability mechanisms are designed to ensure that public institutions operate effectively, efficiently, and in accordance with legal and ethical standards. The implementation of performance accountability systems enables governments to monitor policy implementation and evaluate administrative performance in delivering public services. This study aims to analyze the role of government performance accountability in strengthening transparent governance and improving administrative effectiveness. The research adopts a qualitative descriptive approach through literature review and policy document analysis. Data were obtained from scientific publications, government reports, and policy documents related to public sector accountability and governance reform. The findings indicate that the implementation of performance accountability systems contributes significantly to improving transparency, strengthening institutional control, and enhancing public trust in government institutions. However, several challenges remain, including institutional capacity limitations, inconsistencies in policy implementation, and inadequate monitoring mechanisms. Strengthening institutional governance frameworks and improving administrative capacity are necessary strategies to enhance the effectiveness of accountability systems in public administration.
Downloads
References
Andrews, R., & Van de Walle, S. (2016). Public management review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1014394
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B., & Bloomberg, L. (2017). Public value governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12745
De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12464
Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2016). Public management reform. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679282.001.0001
Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2018). E-participation and transparency. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12846
Lindgren, I., & Van Veenstra, A. (2018). Digital government transformation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.003
Meijer, A. (2017). Transparency in governance. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315616758
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Digital transformation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Osborne, S. (2018). Public service logic. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1364401
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform.
Torfing, J., Peters, B., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2020). Interactive governance. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199596756.001.0001
Wang, H., & Wan Wart, M. (2021). Public leadership. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13276
Zhang, Y., & Yang, K. (2022). Digital governance and accountability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101640
Purwanto, E. A., & Pramusinto, A. (2018). Reformasi birokrasi di Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.36320
Sari, D., & Nugroho, R. (2021). Transparency in public administration. https://doi.org/10.22146/jap.65432
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dorthea Renyaan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
